My favorite example of this was uncovered by this blog, the purpose of which I'm totally unclear on. Back in 2005, a commenter there pointed out that the following photo is not of an unidentified kidnap victim being liberated from the trunk of a car, as the caption claimed, but instead shows (now former) professional wrestler Joy Giovanni.

Three years later, the same photo (a direct lift from an actual televised storyline in the WWE. YouTube here.) is still associated with the AP story (as seen here on MSNBC.com). That's comical.
Thankfully, in this case, technology hasn't outrun ethics. Though less-than-ethical photographers may manipulate their images to intensify the drama within, the Internet has more than enough Photoshop experts to identify and vilify those that do so. There are countless other issues with the "democratization" of journalism as it moves online (more on that to come, I'm sure), but here the art benefits from readers keeping practitioners on the straight and narrow. Would such a hardcore WWE fan have come across that image had it only appeared in newsprint? Doubtful.
1 comments:
Too bad the readers aren't a little faster at pointing out problems... witness the temporary crash of United Airlines stock when an old story was posted as new. A lot can happen before the crowd catches mistakes.
Post a Comment